Skip to main content

DEGRADATION OF INDIAN CULTURE

world greatest civilisation once developed in india in harrapa and mohamjodaro but what was the reason that it went down. harrapa civilisation had about 2 lakh people living there, on the other hand  mohonjodaro was even more larger with a more number of people living there .
                                                                                                                                they were highly developed. this fact can be deduced from the fact that when pyramids were being build at that time harrapa was already a developed and organised city. the question is still then why India declined to present status.




pre-harrapan civilization had its root most probably in mehergarh in pakistan. people from there spread towards east and understood the power of water, air and fire. this fact is evident from the early vedas, which shows Indra, varuna and agni as major God in contrary to Gods of later vadic period who where brahma, vishnu and Mahesh. although these vedas are thought to be of vedic age whoch started after Indus valley civilization but it gives enough insight. Indus civilisation started to decline in 1500 BCE and vedic age spans around 1500-500BCE. also barley and wheat are the staple food of both IVC (Indus Valley Civilisation) and the early vadic age which later got changed in later vadic age to rice so there is never a sudden change in materialisstic society. moving further you might have encountered various fact about IVC like they had vary organised water harvesting system, they had  bathroom atttached to there cubical room made of bricks and road were made of fire cooked bricks. apart form these there language are yet to be deciphered. many believe that the signs and symbol that were fouund in seals of IVC are just a pictographic, logographic and not alphabetic.
                                                                        was there any difference between IVC and early vadic period ! answer is yes for example most of the researchers (source: history of early india--by romila thapar)  thinks that people of IVC used to read from right to left. but we have vadic texts that is read from left ot right.
trade:
IVC had trade relation with mesopotamia and oman.













I WILL SOON BE COMPLETING THIS ARTICLE.....trying to buy some time out of my busy shedule.

Comments

Post a Comment

Please provided your valuable comment on:

Aryan133aryan@gmail.com

Popular posts from this blog

Peasant movement during freedom struggle

Unlike the earlier peasant movements that arose from discontentment among the peasantry, the peasant movements in the twentieth century were influenced by national freedom struggle. This phase witnessed an increased involvement of middle-class, modern educated class in peasant resistance movements. This led to percolation of the idea of nationalism among the peasantry too. Gandhian Peasant Movements These movements were essentially non violent in nature. Satyagraha (fast unto death) was the defining feature of these moments to build moral pressure on britishers to accept their demands. Champaran Satyagraha 1917 : In Champaran, the peasants were agitating against the planters who were forcing the peasants to grow indigo under the exploitative tinkathia system . This system forced cultivation of indigo in 3/20th of land held by the peasant. One of their leaders, Raj Kumar Sukul invited Gandhi to resolve the issue. Gandhi led the movement by launching satyagraha and mobilised the peasan...
Post a Comment
Read more

Different perspective of Freedom-----market economy vs social stability

  What we can define we can control, perhaps this is the reason why we cant define emotion. This article is all about Freedom and its scope.   I will define freedom as this   article progresses towards required point. Pre-requisite: Cost of Happiness: happiness is not something static, it’s a dynamic concept and its directly linked to the edge of our freely floating mind . In other words if someone/something is responsible for your happiness(social/sexual/psychological) wont last long until and unless there is some desirable or at least some socially acknowledgeable value is added to the status quo. Now since this change traces the edge of our freely floating mind (and our mind tend to spread to the extreme extant of our economic/social/psychological reach) it becomes difficult or rather costly to continuously sustain this change. I call it cost of happiness   , that we have to keep paying .   Biasness: Lack of knowledge is called biasness. If ...
1 comment
Read more

आजादी

जिसे हम परिभाषित कर सकते हैं उसे हम नियंत्रित कर सकते हैं, शायद यही कारण है कि हम भावनाओं को परिभाषित नहीं कर सकते। यह लेख सभी स्वतंत्रता और इसके दायरे के बारे में है।   मैं स्वतंत्रता को परिभाषित करूंगा क्योंकि यह लेख आवश्यक बिंदु की ओर बढ़ता है। पूर्व-अपेक्षा: खुशी की लागत: खुशी कुछ स्थिर नहीं है, यह एक गतिशील अवधारणा है और इसका सीधा संबंध हमारे स्वतंत्र रूप से तैरने वाले दिमाग से है। दूसरे शब्दों में अगर कोई / कुछ आपकी खुशी के लिए ज़िम्मेदार है (सामाजिक / यौन / मनोवैज्ञानिक) लंबे समय तक नहीं होगा और जब तक कि कुछ वांछनीय या कम से कम कुछ सामाजिक रूप से स्वीकार्य मूल्य को यथास्थिति में नहीं जोड़ा जाता है। अब चूंकि यह परिवर्तन हमारे स्वतंत्र रूप से तैरने वाले मन के किनारे का पता लगाता है (और हमारा दिमाग हमारी आर्थिक / सामाजिक / मनोवैज्ञानिक पहुंच के चरम विस्तार तक फैलता है) इस परिवर्तन को निरंतर बनाए रखना मुश्किल या महंगा हो जाता है। मैं इसे खुशी की कीमत कहता हूं, कि हमें भुगतान करते रहना है।   Biasness: ज्ञान की कमी को पूर्वाग्रह कहा जाता है। यदि आप किसी विशेष धर्म, संबंध, सरक...
Post a Comment
Read more