Skip to main content

Employment required to prevent jobless growth !

Preoject DISTRESS:
--------------------------------------------

Assumption: At 21 Year age at an average, Indian needs job to support.
Fact 1:     2.5 crore people attaining the age of 21 every year (Source of data : census of India 2001,2011).
Percentage of Agricultural work force: more than 50 % (Source economic survey 2018), let take 50%.
percentage of women in India=48.5%
percentage of working women in India=28.5%


Calculation:

We have 2.5 crore adults acquiring age of 21 every year, so minimum 2.5 crore jobs are required every year-----
BUT 48.5% of population of India are women, so 48.5% of this 2.5 crore approx must be women, which is 12,125,000.(12,875,000 this is left over)
and 25.5% women works = 25.5% of 12125000=3,091,875 women are working.
so, Total Indian requiring works= working women + working men=(3,091,875) + (12,875,000)=15,966,875 Indian

Now lets subtract Agricultural work force, as they already have land to work on, In other words Government is not responsible for generation of Agricultural job .
So keeping this in mind:
total agricultural workforce share in 2.5 crore Indian = 50% of 2.5 crore = 1.25 crore

Finally, net effective works to be generated each year = 15,966,875 - 1.25  = 3,466,875 Indian


Note this amount of job will just suffice minimum requirement to ensure society doesn't develop nor takes any retrospective path. As women who were not working till now has been assumed will not work ever and so does the farmers.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Please provided your valuable comment on:

Aryan133aryan@gmail.com

Popular posts from this blog

Peasant movement during freedom struggle

Unlike the earlier peasant movements that arose from discontentment among the peasantry, the peasant movements in the twentieth century were influenced by national freedom struggle. This phase witnessed an increased involvement of middle-class, modern educated class in peasant resistance movements. This led to percolation of the idea of nationalism among the peasantry too. Gandhian Peasant Movements These movements were essentially non violent in nature. Satyagraha (fast unto death) was the defining feature of these moments to build moral pressure on britishers to accept their demands. Champaran Satyagraha 1917 : In Champaran, the peasants were agitating against the planters who were forcing the peasants to grow indigo under the exploitative tinkathia system . This system forced cultivation of indigo in 3/20th of land held by the peasant. One of their leaders, Raj Kumar Sukul invited Gandhi to resolve the issue. Gandhi led the movement by launching satyagraha and mobilised the peasan...
Post a Comment
Read more

Different perspective of Freedom-----market economy vs social stability

  What we can define we can control, perhaps this is the reason why we cant define emotion. This article is all about Freedom and its scope.   I will define freedom as this   article progresses towards required point. Pre-requisite: Cost of Happiness: happiness is not something static, it’s a dynamic concept and its directly linked to the edge of our freely floating mind . In other words if someone/something is responsible for your happiness(social/sexual/psychological) wont last long until and unless there is some desirable or at least some socially acknowledgeable value is added to the status quo. Now since this change traces the edge of our freely floating mind (and our mind tend to spread to the extreme extant of our economic/social/psychological reach) it becomes difficult or rather costly to continuously sustain this change. I call it cost of happiness   , that we have to keep paying .   Biasness: Lack of knowledge is called biasness. If ...
1 comment
Read more

आजादी

जिसे हम परिभाषित कर सकते हैं उसे हम नियंत्रित कर सकते हैं, शायद यही कारण है कि हम भावनाओं को परिभाषित नहीं कर सकते। यह लेख सभी स्वतंत्रता और इसके दायरे के बारे में है।   मैं स्वतंत्रता को परिभाषित करूंगा क्योंकि यह लेख आवश्यक बिंदु की ओर बढ़ता है। पूर्व-अपेक्षा: खुशी की लागत: खुशी कुछ स्थिर नहीं है, यह एक गतिशील अवधारणा है और इसका सीधा संबंध हमारे स्वतंत्र रूप से तैरने वाले दिमाग से है। दूसरे शब्दों में अगर कोई / कुछ आपकी खुशी के लिए ज़िम्मेदार है (सामाजिक / यौन / मनोवैज्ञानिक) लंबे समय तक नहीं होगा और जब तक कि कुछ वांछनीय या कम से कम कुछ सामाजिक रूप से स्वीकार्य मूल्य को यथास्थिति में नहीं जोड़ा जाता है। अब चूंकि यह परिवर्तन हमारे स्वतंत्र रूप से तैरने वाले मन के किनारे का पता लगाता है (और हमारा दिमाग हमारी आर्थिक / सामाजिक / मनोवैज्ञानिक पहुंच के चरम विस्तार तक फैलता है) इस परिवर्तन को निरंतर बनाए रखना मुश्किल या महंगा हो जाता है। मैं इसे खुशी की कीमत कहता हूं, कि हमें भुगतान करते रहना है।   Biasness: ज्ञान की कमी को पूर्वाग्रह कहा जाता है। यदि आप किसी विशेष धर्म, संबंध, सरक...
Post a Comment
Read more