Skip to main content

Global Hunger Index 2020




Global Hunger Index 2020 - social issue
Why india performed poorer then countries like Pakistan?

 

Key highlights:

1.       India Scores 27.2 (Serious zone)

a.       0=no hunger

b.      <9 = low severity

c.       10 to 19.9 = moderate

d.      20 to 34.9=34.9 serious

e.      >35= Alarming

2.       Second last in south asia (even below pakistan)

3.       China + Brajil scored < 5 (low severity nation)

4.       South Africa =13.5 (moderate nation)

5.       India's poor rank bcoz of Wasting + Stunting ( highest in world)

a.       Note:

                                       i.            African countries= child are born good but as they grow older they are affected by undernourishment.

                                     ii.            India =Child is born with these issues…….so providing nourishment later is like applying banded over severe wound. .....reason is explained below in "3.     Why is it?" section.

 

 

 

 

How its calculated?

1.       3 factors= equal waitage ---> converted into score between 0 to 100

a.       1st factor= Undernourishment (of population of India not just children)

b.      2nd factor=for child under 5 year= mortality rate

c.       3rd factor=for child under 5 year=stunting(chronic undernourishment) + wasting(Acute undernourishment)

2.       Published by Concern Worldwide and Wealthungerhlife 

3.       Data these 2 agency takes from :

a.       In below digram each of the international agency takes data from india from NFH Survey. Therefore there is a time lag.(2020 has data from 2019).

 

 



What GHI says?

Factors

what

score

Undernourishment

Reflects lack of calorific intake in general population

14% does not get enough calories( 20% in 2005-2007)

Mortality rate

Both undernourishment + Environment are responsible

3.7% mortality of under 5(9.2% in 2000)

Stunting + Wasting

Majorly bcoz of nourishment issue in child or mother

 

1.       35% stunted (earlier 54.2%) but still worst in the world.

2.       17.3% are wasted(almost no improvement in it) worst in the world

Why Stunting+Wasting is poorest?

1.       After looking at african case it is clear that economic strength is not the role player in india it’s the SOCIAL INSTITUTION.

2.       Bcoz poor nation like pakistan and african countries have, inspite of lesser percapita then india has performed better. So it must be something social that’s haunting stunting and wasting rate in india

3.     Why is it?

a.       Poor status of women in india.

b.      42% of adolescent girls aged 15 to 19 have low BMI.

c.       27% of girls in india are married before the legal age of 18

                                       i.            8% starts bearing child in adolescent age.

d.      About 50% women do not have access to contraceptive

e.      Poor sanitaiton@women often lead to Diarrhoea a major factor in wasting and stunting.

 

f.        Nationally if we look at, poor states like Bihar , rajasthan and Odisha have performed better then national average in wasting. Infact rich state like T.N , West Bengal has performed worse then Bihar in Wasting(Jharkhand has worst Wasting in India).

                                       i.      While same Bihar has performed the worst in Stunting.

 

Conclusion:

So our ranking in first 2 parameters(nourishment + mortality) has improved; But its the 3rd one (Stunting=Less hight as per age & Wasting = less weight as per age) which has become bone of contention. and its not the money that matters here, we have to work on social setup of india. Feminism needs to be redirected on real issues like reinforcing constitutional rights of women.

 Farmers has done their part, look at the outcomes of Green rovolutions now its our turn.

 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Peasant movement during freedom struggle

Unlike the earlier peasant movements that arose from discontentment among the peasantry, the peasant movements in the twentieth century were influenced by national freedom struggle. This phase witnessed an increased involvement of middle-class, modern educated class in peasant resistance movements. This led to percolation of the idea of nationalism among the peasantry too. Gandhian Peasant Movements These movements were essentially non violent in nature. Satyagraha (fast unto death) was the defining feature of these moments to build moral pressure on britishers to accept their demands. Champaran Satyagraha 1917 : In Champaran, the peasants were agitating against the planters who were forcing the peasants to grow indigo under the exploitative tinkathia system . This system forced cultivation of indigo in 3/20th of land held by the peasant. One of their leaders, Raj Kumar Sukul invited Gandhi to resolve the issue. Gandhi led the movement by launching satyagraha and mobilised the peasan...

Different perspective of Freedom-----market economy vs social stability

  What we can define we can control, perhaps this is the reason why we cant define emotion. This article is all about Freedom and its scope.   I will define freedom as this   article progresses towards required point. Pre-requisite: Cost of Happiness: happiness is not something static, it’s a dynamic concept and its directly linked to the edge of our freely floating mind . In other words if someone/something is responsible for your happiness(social/sexual/psychological) wont last long until and unless there is some desirable or at least some socially acknowledgeable value is added to the status quo. Now since this change traces the edge of our freely floating mind (and our mind tend to spread to the extreme extant of our economic/social/psychological reach) it becomes difficult or rather costly to continuously sustain this change. I call it cost of happiness   , that we have to keep paying .   Biasness: Lack of knowledge is called biasness. If ...

आजादी

जिसे हम परिभाषित कर सकते हैं उसे हम नियंत्रित कर सकते हैं, शायद यही कारण है कि हम भावनाओं को परिभाषित नहीं कर सकते। यह लेख सभी स्वतंत्रता और इसके दायरे के बारे में है।   मैं स्वतंत्रता को परिभाषित करूंगा क्योंकि यह लेख आवश्यक बिंदु की ओर बढ़ता है। पूर्व-अपेक्षा: खुशी की लागत: खुशी कुछ स्थिर नहीं है, यह एक गतिशील अवधारणा है और इसका सीधा संबंध हमारे स्वतंत्र रूप से तैरने वाले दिमाग से है। दूसरे शब्दों में अगर कोई / कुछ आपकी खुशी के लिए ज़िम्मेदार है (सामाजिक / यौन / मनोवैज्ञानिक) लंबे समय तक नहीं होगा और जब तक कि कुछ वांछनीय या कम से कम कुछ सामाजिक रूप से स्वीकार्य मूल्य को यथास्थिति में नहीं जोड़ा जाता है। अब चूंकि यह परिवर्तन हमारे स्वतंत्र रूप से तैरने वाले मन के किनारे का पता लगाता है (और हमारा दिमाग हमारी आर्थिक / सामाजिक / मनोवैज्ञानिक पहुंच के चरम विस्तार तक फैलता है) इस परिवर्तन को निरंतर बनाए रखना मुश्किल या महंगा हो जाता है। मैं इसे खुशी की कीमत कहता हूं, कि हमें भुगतान करते रहना है।   Biasness: ज्ञान की कमी को पूर्वाग्रह कहा जाता है। यदि आप किसी विशेष धर्म, संबंध, सरक...